As a result of the Covid-19 epidemic, Deloitte conducted a study late last year revealing that half of all respondents plan on increasing cordless investment. Network security can be provided for a wide range of remote workers.
The time has come to take a look at how it provides secure internet to telecommuters
Truth be told, the remote workforce grew from 10% to 100% overnight in many companies. This has hugely affected the network architecture incorporated with the traditional hub and the social model that requires a unified delivery of security.
A virtual private network (VPN) in the data center handles both incoming and outgoing traffic, and a security strategy enables the data center to be more controlled and data to be visible to telecommuters. The issue is that the hub and radio model isn’t ideal for the huge amount of traffic or the sort of traffic that is presently moving through the network. Resulting in reset VPN connections. Clients report on capacity and bandwidth issues. They can’t sign in or connect. Performance is moderate, while latency makes obstacles in regular business processes.
Remote users don’t have access to the tools and data they have to proceed with their business, which influences business progression. Also, VPN infrastructure is extremely unpredictable and tedious and to do this for 100% of the workforce takes months if not years.
Companies have been trying to fix overwhelmed VPNs with split tunnels.
The split tunnels separate the movement into two cubes. Local applications keep on moving through VPNs, where IT teams have visibility and control to monitor, manage, and protect information.
On the other hand, Internet traffic (Internet browsing, email, SaaS platforms, and web applications) is sent directly to the Internet, without a VPN. This configuration can lessen VPN traffic by more than 70 percent, giving secure access to remote users without over-burdening the infrastructure.
Simultaneously, users will be able to appreciate the Internet freely without any potential repercussions, with PC and data activity moving beyond the traditional perimeter of security and essentially growing attack surfaces. Users have no protection against progressively modern cybersecurity threats, for example, managing zero-day attacks, downloading malware, ransomware, and phishing.
Just a single user needs to tap on one malicious link to bargain with the company’s business systems and information. Multiply it by the whole workforce that works remotely beyond the consideration of the Firewall and security team and altogether expands the risk.
The best way to protect Internet traffic that a VPN prevents is to provide security services over the cloud. Cloud security guarantees that the approach monitors the users from whom they enter. The worldwide proxy in the cloud acts as the main issue of security control for all traffic, providing an overall and separate layer of security in the cloud through which all web traffic passes.
It is possible to enact a security policy here to ensure that it is executed regardless of whether the user is outside the Firewall or coming from their home. The Global Cloud Proxy system allows you to split tunnels without bargaining security.
A VPN controls and secures traffic to and from the data center.
Cloud-based worldwide proxy systems encrypt traffic to and from the Internet. This guarantees the full execution of security policies across traffic (counting HTTPS). While lessening VPN speeds by up to 70 percent, allowing companies to evaluate their work-from-home capacities in emergencies.
The future of work is here, yet traditional VPNs fail to meet the security needs of the current remote workforce. A split tunnel can lighten operational issues, however, web traffic will be vulnerable to cybersecurity threats. The development of cloud security services tackles this issue. Services allow companies to divert Internet traffic to the cloud in the global security layer. As yet depending on VPN protection for database entry and exit traffic.
It is impossible to guarantee network security using traditional methods
The only constant in life change. This way of thinking applies to corporate network security is always advancing, often set off by events, for example, the 2017 NotPetya ransomware attack that crashed a large number of PCs around the globe with a single password. These events lead to changes in the network architectures and the ways of thinking on which they are based.
The Internet was at first unsafe.
At the time of its creation, there were notable issues that had to be addressed. For quite a long time, the network security theory has focused on protecting the interior from external threats. This was a similar way of thinking on which the Romans relied to protect their borders.
The meaning of perimeters seemed well and good at the beginning of network security. And focused on the essential guideline of top-to-bottom defense – protection of internal resources from external forces.
In this scenario, the representatives were in contact with the workplace. Their ability to protect the resources they accessed depended on the walls of their workplace.
If you go out, workers will become intruders trying to access the same resources. The traditional security perimeter was weak. It usually worked despite the take-off chuck points for medium-sized software devices that depended heavily on static security policies.
Network security best practices are necessary
In any case, security best practices and the devices that go into the devices are ultimately not supported or get obsolete as next-generation practices and technologies replace them – until a critical crisis strikes. At that point, the driver for change was a non-digital virus: COVID-19.
Check out our company website to learn more about network security and cybersecurity solutions. We provide customized solutions to protect your network, data, and business.
